Legal Opinion

Suhr v. Koll

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 19, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01697Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DANIEL SUHR, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-CV-1697-SCD RYAN BILLINGS, JANE DOE, DEAN R. DIETRICH, MARTINA RAE GAST, DEANNE M. KOLL, MELODIE WISEMAN, and LARRY MARTIN, in their official capacities as officers of the State Bar of Wisconsin, Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT Daniel Suhr, a Wisconsin lawyer, claims the State Bar of Wisconsin is violating his constitutional rights to freedom of speech and freedom of association. After the parties…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Hallinan v. Fraternal Order of Police of Chicago Lodge No. 7Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API