Missouri Pacific Railroad v. English
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The principal cause of complaint is that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in behalf of appellant. This is based upon the theory that Lydia English was a trespasser or at most a licensee, and the case of Barnett v. St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co., 140 Okla. 19, 282 P. 120, is relied upon to sustain this theory.
The facts in the Barnett case were that plaintiff was walking along a pathway near the track of the defendant which had been used by the public for a long number of years with the knowledge and acquiescence of the railroad company, and that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CogswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. DooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Snow's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Texas, O. & E. R. Co. v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Faye Hendrix Vickers, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Ray Hendrix, Deceased v. Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Aluminum Co. of America v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Aluminum Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Faye Hendrix Vickers, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Ray Hendrix, Deceased v. Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.