Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. English

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1933No. 4-3033PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The principal cause of complaint is that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in behalf of appellant. This is based upon the theory that Lydia English was a trespasser or at most a licensee, and the case of Barnett v. St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co., 140 Okla. 19, 282 P. 120, is relied upon to sustain this theory.

The facts in the Barnett case were that plaintiff was walking along a pathway near the track of the defendant which had been used by the public for a long number of years with the knowledge and acquiescence of the railroad company, and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CogswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. DooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Snow's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Texas, O. & E. R. Co. v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Faye Hendrix Vickers, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Ray Hendrix, Deceased v. Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Aluminum Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Faye Hendrix Vickers, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Ray Hendrix, Deceased v. Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API