Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1990No. 8917DC947Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

On appeal, plaintiff argues Judge Martin erred in denying his motion to be relieved from the “consent judgment.” We agree.

*501The authority of a court to sign and enter a consent judgment depends upon the unqualified consent of the parties thereto, and the judgment is void if such consent does not exist at the time the court sanctions or approves the agreement of the parties and promulgates it as a judgment. Lynch v. Lynch, 74 N.C. App. 540, 329 S.E.2d 415 (1985); Overton v. Overton, 259 N.C. 31, 129 S.E.2d 593 (1963). In Wachovia Bank v. Bounous, 53 N.C. App. 700, 706, 281…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. BounousCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Lynch v. LynchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API