Legal Opinion

Shelby v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1908PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are stated in the Opinion. The defendant pleaded in its answer two separate and distinct defenses. The plaintiff demurred to one of them, as he had a right to do. Revisal, sec. 435. The demurrer was overruled, and the plaintiff appealed. This is obnoxious to the rule forbidding fragmentary appeals. All appeal from a ruling upon one of several issues will be dismissed. Hines v. Hines, 84 N.C. 122; Arrington v. Arrington,91 N.C. 301.

The plaintiff should have noted his exception and the judge should have proceeded with the trial upon both issues. If both issues or only the issue as to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hines v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Arrington v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Joyner v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Wake County v. MagninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Kleibor v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Mercer v. HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API