Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 20, 1991No. 05-90-00966-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MALONEY, Justice.
James Ray Phillips appeals from a summary judgment rendered in favor of Union Bankers Insurance Company. In three points of error, Phillips contends that the trial court erred in: (1) granting the summary judgment; (2) construing the unambiguous language of the contract; and (3) finding the contract unambiguous. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Phillips was insured by a Union Bankers health insurance policy. The policy provided that “[cjhildren born to you while this policy is in force shall be insured from and after the moment of birth.”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Derr Construction Co. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Bailey, Vaught, Robertson and Co. v. Remington Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- American States Insurance v. Hanson IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Tri County Service Co. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Griffin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.