Legal Opinion
Curry v. Feld
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 8, 1939No. 6 Div. 515PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The decree from which the appeal is taken granted the injunctive relief prayed and restrained and enjoined the respondent, City of Birmingham, from interfering in any way with the conduct of complainant’s business and- redelivered the property seized by the agent of the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Alabama.
Among other things, the decree states the following:
“1: That the conduct of the business of the complainants as set forth in this cause be and same is hereby adjudged to be a bona fide engagement in interstate commerce.
“2: That so long as complainants conduct…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. HennefordSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Wiloil Corp. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dixie Coaches, Inc. v. RamsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- State v. Thames, Jackson, Harris Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Leibold v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- State v. SteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- City of Birmingham v. Hoffman & RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.