Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Submission of controversy without action under Code Civil Proc. § 1279, between Harriett A. Raymond, Dora V. Rappleyea, and Ina Jane Lotzar, as plaintiffs, and the Rochester Trust & Safe-Deposit Company, administrator with the will annexed of Henry B. Raymond, deceased, as defendant. Judgment for defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The controversy here submitted relates to the-construction of the will of the defendant’s testator, of which the following is the text, complete, viz.:

“I, Henry B. Raymond, of the city of Rochester, Monroe county, N. Y., do make, publish, and declare this, my last will and testament, as follows,, to wit:
“First. After all my lawful debts and funeral expenses are paid, I give, devise, and bequeath to my wife, Hattie A. Raymond, the use of all my real and personal property, including all life-insurance moneys, during the-term of her natural life, or so long as she shall remain my widow, charging…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Asche v. . AscheNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Greer v. ChesterNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  4. In re ShepherdNew York Surrogate's Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Cafone v. Spiniello Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Stamen v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Delaware River and Bay Auth. v. INTERNATIONAL ORG. ETC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. Puzio v. PuzioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API