Legal Opinion

Puzio v. Puzio

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 29, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

57 N.J. Super. 557 (1959)

155 A.2d 115

THERESA PUZIO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

CIRO PUZIO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 14, 1959.

Decided October 29, 1959.

Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and HALPERN.

Mr. Louis Santorf argued the cause for defendant-appellant.

Mr. J. Mortimer Rubenstein argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

The Chancery Division granted plaintiff, a New York resident, an award of separate maintenance from her husband, the defendant, a resident of Paterson. The judgment…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of NeuwirthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. CarriereNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Reliance Ins. v. Armstrong W. Ind.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. City of Philadelphia v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. Kram v. KramNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API