Howell v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
This statement of the nature and result of the suit is substantially that made by the appellants — with interpolation of the district court’s action, in response to a motion then made by appellee therefor, in requiring appellants to first offer their evidence of their claimed right to maintain a contest of the Ulrick will, to-wit:
“This is a will contest, filed by Kate Howell, joined by her husband, M. E. Howell, as the adopted daughter of R. F. Ulrick and wife, Maggie Ulrick, to the probate of the will offered as that of R. F. Ulrick, deceased, by J. M. Thompson. Her claim of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jones v. GuyTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Cubley v. BarbeeTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Moore v. StarkTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Cheney v. CoffeyTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Hopf v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Calvert v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Garcia v. SaenzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Willie Mae Minefield, Widow of Lige Minefield v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Hilt v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.