Legal Opinion

Creighton v. Vincent

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Benton County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Lord, C. J.:

In this case it is admitted that the original indebtedness is barred, and the only question, upon the instruction asked and refused, to be decided is, whether a payment of part of the indebtedness applied by the defendant as a credit upon such indebtedness, with the assent of the plaintiff, would have the effect to take the same out of the operation of the statute of limitations. At the argument it was claimed that a proper solution of this question would depend upon the construction which the court should give to section 25 of the code. That section provides:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brisbin v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  2. Whitaker v. RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ah How v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Eastman v. CraryOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Sterrett v. SweeneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Dundee Investment Co. v. HornerOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Blaskower v. SteelOregon Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API