Doherty v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Applicant Doherty was convicted in federal court of smuggling marihuana. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. Doherty’s retained counsel, who had represented him both at trial and on appeal, withdrew after the appellate decision because Doherty was without funds to pay for legal services. Without opinion the Court of Appeals denied Doherty’s pro s.e motion for appointment of counsel to assist in preparing a petition for writ of certiorari. Doherty has now filed a motion in this Court seeking appointment of counsel for that purpose. We treat the motion for appointment of…
2Cited by22 opinions
- United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BucklesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Rivera-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Wilkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Shanta A. Howell and George T. Howell, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.