R.S. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, Judge.
The appellant challenges the order which finds him to be a delinquent child. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that he committed grand theft. We agree and reverse.
The state filed a petition charging the appellant with third-degree grand theft on July 27 and 28, 1992. At trial, Hanloda O’Dell testified that in November 1992 she noticed a few objects missing from her jewelry box. She remembered last seeing them in June of that year. The three pieces of jewelry, a man’s ring with a stone in it, a gold necklace, and a charm, were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heiney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Jaggers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Pacetti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
3Cited by5 opinions
- Luscomb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- S.R.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- RS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- T.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001