Legal Opinion

R.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 29, 1994No. 93-01496PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant challenges the order which finds him to be a delinquent child. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that he committed grand theft. We agree and reverse.

The state filed a petition charging the appellant with third-degree grand theft on July 27 and 28, 1992. At trial, Hanloda O’Dell testified that in November 1992 she noticed a few objects missing from her jewelry box. She remembered last seeing them in June of that year. The three pieces of jewelry, a man’s ring with a stone in it, a gold necklace, and a charm, were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heiney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Jaggers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Pacetti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luscomb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. S.R.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. RS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. T.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API