Legal Opinion

Luscomb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 25, 1995No. 94-2854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence for grand theft.

The question on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence.

William Holloway, the owner of two Texaco Food Marts, testified at trial that there were six employees working in his Homosas-sa store between December of 1993 and January of 1994. Generally, there are two shifts a day and two employees on each shift. The first shift is from 6:00 a.m. through 2:00 or 3:00 p.m. and the second shift is from the end of the first shift through 11:00 p.m. The store has two cash registers, one of which is in front and the other in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Hogge v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Heiney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. Spinkellink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. D.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API