Legal Opinion

Trusty v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1999No. A99A0664PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Harold R. Banke.

Convicted of rape and of enticing a child for indecent purposes, Curtis Trusty appeals on two grounds: insufficient evidence of penetration and the court’s refusal to allow him to cross-examine a witness on prior false accusations of molestation by the child victim. Held:

1. OCGA § 16-6-1 (a) provides: “A person commits the offense of rape when he has carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will. Carnal knowledge in rape occurs when there is any penetration of the female sex organ by the male sex organ.” “In a rape case, penetration may be proved by indirect…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Richie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Fields v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Pittman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API