Legal Opinion
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Lundgren
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2008No. 07 Civ. 5862 (RJH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge.
This is a shareholder derivative action brought by plaintiff Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust (“Plaintiff’) on behalf of nominal defendant Macy’s Inc. (“Macy’s”), asserting causes of action for violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, various breaches of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. The allegedly wrongful acts occurred between August 2005 and the present. Defendants Terry J. Lundgren, Karen M. Hoguet, Sara Lev-inson,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Beam Ex Rel. M. Stewart Living v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Saic Inc. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Canez v. Intelligent Systems CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Carter v. GriffinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Dorfman v. MGP Ingredients, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- In re Eastman Kodak Company Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023