Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Belterra Resort Indiana, LLC
Indiana Supreme Court
1DissentBoehm, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I believe the majority adopts a definition of contribution to capital that incorrectly assumes a contribution to capital is for no consideration, and then imports contract law notions of consideration to conclude that Belterra's transfer of this riverboat to its subsidiary was not a contribution to capital.
The sales and use taxes are imposed on "retail transactions," which are defined as "selling at retail." Ind.Code § 6-2.5-4-1(a) (2010). A person is defined as "selling at retail" when:
[I]n the ordinary course of his regularly conducted trade or business, he: (1)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commissioner v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., and Its Subsidiary, Super Market Developers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Mason Metals Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
- Belterra Resort Indiana, LLC v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2009