Legal Opinion

Fugmann v. Detmer

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided July 17, 2019No. 5:18-cv-00358Unknown

1Opinion

gE lie □□ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUL 17 2019 EASTE DE Cy ‘ N TUCKY AT LEXINGTON ., .., ROBERT R. CARR AT LEXINGTON CLERK U.S. DISTRICT CouRT CHRIS FUGMANN, CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-cv-358- KKC Plaintiff, V. ORDER & OPINION DANIEL DETMER, et al., Defendants. tek dk dk Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. [DE 43; DE 44.] Plaintiff Chris Fugmann has moved for partial summary judgment on his breach of contract, equitable estoppel, fraud in the inducement, and promissory estoppel claims. [DE 43.] Defendants Daniel Detmer and C2 IT, LLC d/b/a Nelson Comfort, on the other…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API