Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Hagans

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 13, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINFELD, Judge.

Appellant Barnett and Alert Oil & Gas Company were co-owners of a gas well known as Romans Well # 2. A dispute arose as to whether Barnett agreed to convey to appellee, Hagans, a 10-percent working interest in that well in settlement of an undetermined amount Hagans claimed for overpayment in a joint venture involving a Knott County well and in consideration of Hagans’ having obtained for Barnett an oil and gas lease of the property on which the well was located. Suit was instituted to force Barnett to convey a 10-per-cent working interest and for an accounting and payment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Beckett-Iseman Oil Co. v. BackerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Arrington v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Williams' Adm'r v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Corbett v. La BereNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Cumberland & Manchester Railroad v. PoseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adkins v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
  2. Owen v. DaysonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API