Legal Opinion

People v. Hicks

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2004PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree for the possession of a narcotic drug with intent to sell (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]). Following a buy-and-bust operation, police arrested defendant and found 14 glassine envelopes of heroin on his person. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the arresting officer to testify that the packaging of the drugs recovered from defendant was inconsistent with personal use…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Matott v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. SudlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. PetronioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. MenendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API