Legal Opinion

Eastern Telecom Corp. v. Borough of East Conemaugh

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 30, 1989No. 88-3516PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Chief Judge:

Eastern Telecom Corporation, an operator of cable television systems, including the system serving the Borough of East Conemaugh, Pennsylvania, appeals from a judgment in favor of that Borough in Eastern’s suit seeking to compel the Borough to comply with the franchise renewal procedures in the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984. Pub.L. 98-549, 98 Stat. 2780, 47 U.S.C. § 521 et seq. (Supp. II1984). The suit was tried non-jury, and the district court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court found that the Borough had in compliance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mary E. Tucker v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. In Re Paul Weldon Herd, Debtor. Rowe International, Inc. v. Paul Weldon HerdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warner Cable Communications Inc. v. Borough of Schuylkill HavenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Rolla Cable Systems, Inc. v. City of RollaDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
  3. Cox Cable Adv. Coun. v. Pub. Ut. Con., No. Cv 00 0500103s (Nov. 17, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
  4. Eastern Telecom Corporation v. Borough Of East ConemaughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API