Legal Opinion
Opinion No. (1985)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided December 10, 1985Published
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Honorable Hooper,
The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking, in effect:
1. Do the provisions of the General Obligation Public Securities Refunding Act, 62 O.S. 751 (1984) et seq., violate Article X, Section 26 of the Oklahoma Constitution by allowing a public body under certain circumstances to refund outstanding indebtedness obligations without a vote of the people at an election held for this purpose:
a. Where the original obligations are canceled concurrently with the issuance of refunding obligations; or
b. Where the net proceeds of the refunding bonds…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- South Carolina v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doon Township v. CumminsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. City of SunriseSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- City of Huron v. Second Ward Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.