Legal Opinion

State v. Morgan

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1985No. 15552PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This case presents an issue of procedural due process in sentencing. William Morgan stands convicted of grand theft. He contends that the sentence was based in part upon erroneous information which he did not have a full opportunity to rebut. For reasons expressed below, we vacate the sentence and remand the case.

Morgan’s crime consisted of stealing six aluminum planks from bleachers located at a baseball park in Lewiston. After pleading guilty he remained free on bond awaiting sentence. At the sentencing hearing, the district judge reviewed the presentence report, made some…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. Gary MalcolmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. State v. UrquhartIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. UptonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. McDonald v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. DunnIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. AllisonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. ReidIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API