Legal Opinion

Joe E. Parsons v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1971No. 14712_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:

The sole question on this appeal is whether a civil action may be brought by a railroad employee against his employer on a contract governing rates of pay, to which his union was a party, when he has not exhausted his administrative remedies. The company defended on the grounds that the plaintiff had exhausted neither his contractual right of arbitration nor his statutory remedies through the Railroad Adjustment Board. 1 The district court, 310 F.Supp. 1197, dismissed the action, and we affirm.

The dispute arises out of the 1959 merger between the Norfolk & Western…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. KoppalSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Walker v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nizinski v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hazel O. Haney v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company and Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Chapple v. Fairmont General Hospital, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Local Division 519, Amalgamated Transit Union v. LaCrosse Municipal Transit UtilityDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1978
  5. Sorensen v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API