Legal Opinion

County of Sussex v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 7, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

796 A.2d 913 (2002)

351 N.J. Super. 1

The COUNTY OF SUSSEX, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 15, 2002.

Decided May 7, 2002.

Dean A. Gaver argued the cause for appellant (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Himmel, Iselin, attorneys; Dean A. Gaver, of counsel and, with Steven Firkser, on the brief).

Dennis R. McConnell, argued the cause, for respondent (McConnell, Stanhope, Lenard & Griggs, attorneys: Dennis R. McConnell, of counsel and, with Robert B. Campbell, Andover,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. CTY. OF SUSSEX v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  2. City of Trenton v. 222 West Associates FundNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Township of Piscataway v. South Washington Avenue, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Readington Tp. v. Solberg AviationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API