Legal Opinion
CTY. OF SUSSEX v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 18, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
796 A.2d 958 (2001)
351 N.J. Super. 66
The COUNTY OF SUSSEX, Plaintiff,
v.
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Sussex County.
Decided May 18, 2001.
Dennis McConnell, Stanhope, Sussex County Counsel, for plaintiff.
Dean A. Gaver, Woodbridge, for defendant (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Himmel, attorneys).
STANTON, A.J.S.C.
I herewith send to counsel an Order For Judgment And Appointing Commissioners which I have signed in this case today. This Order For Judgment reflects the decision which I made and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Township of Bridgewater v. YarnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- Town of Kearny v. Discount City of Old Bridge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Township of Piscataway v. South Washington Avenue, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Orsett/Columbia Ltd. Partnership v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Readington Tp. v. Solberg AviationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- County of Sussex v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATEDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.