Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Croonquist

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1951No. Nov. 26, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

108 Cal.App.2d Supp. 895 (1951)

L. L. STEINER, Appellant,

v.

HUGH A. CROONQUIST et al., Respondents.

California Court of Appeals.

Nov. 26, 1951.

Ruel Liggett for Appellant.

W. B. Dennis for Respondents.

BURCH, J.

This is an action on two promissory notes, one for $750, dated February 2, 1940, which became due February 1, 1942, the other for $300, dated November 1, 1939, due six months from date. The complaint was filed on May 17, 1950. The court held the notes barred by subdivision 1 of section 337 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff urges on appeal that the affirmative defense of the statute was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API