Legal Opinion

King v. Harrigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1906No. Docket No. 92PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Lapeer; Smith, J. Garnishment proceedings by Robert King against James Harrigan as garnishee of Richard Burden. There was judgment for plaintiff, and the garnishee brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This case was before the court on a motion to dismiss the writ of error 142 Mich. 477. A full statement of the case and of the issues involved is there made, and needs no repetition here. On the same day that the oral examination of the garnishee defendant was filed the-court below rendered a judgment against him for the *437amount of the judgment against the principal defendant. The defendant under the statute (3 Comp. Laws, § 10610) was entitled to 10 days thereafter to demand a trial of the cause. Garnishee proceedings are harsh, and the statutes authorizing them must be strictly followed.

It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. King v. HarriganMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heald v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API