Legal Opinion

King v. Harrigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1905No. Calendar No. 21,032PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Garnishment proceedings by Robert King against James Harrigan as garnishee defendant of Richard Burden. Plaintiff recovered judgment, and defendant brings error: On motion to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The plaintiff obtained judgment against the principal defendant in the circuit court for Lapeer county. Garnishment proceedings were instituted against the garnishee defendant, who filed a disclosure denying liability. Thereupon plaintiff filed a demand for the oral examination of the garnishee, a transcript of whose testimony on such oral examination was signed by him and filed, as required by 3 Comp. Laws, § 10603. In his oral testimony the garnishee defendant again denied his liability. On the day the transcript was filed the court rendered final judgment against the garnishee defendant,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miley v. Grand Traverse Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Haney v. Grand Rapids Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. King v. HarriganMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API