Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Michel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 13, 1991No. 1—90—0773PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaPORTA

Plaintiff sued defendant for negligence after she hired him to perform a sterilization procedure on her and she subsequently experienced the birth of a healthy child and three miscarriages. Following trial, the jury awarded plaintiff $160,000 for pain and suffering and $15,000 for disability and the court entered judgment in that amount. Subsequently the court granted defendant’s timely motion for a new trial. This court then granted plaintiff’s petition for leave to appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306 (134 Ill. 2d R. 306).

On appeal, plaintiff raises these issues: (1) was the jury’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spidle v. StewardIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Batteast v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kemp v. Sisters of the Third Order of St. FrancisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Parvin v. SillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Watson v. Byerly Aviation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carroll v. FaustAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Beattie v. LindelofAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Willis v. MoralesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  4. Willis v. MoralesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. Carroll v. FaustAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API