Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Faust
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 25, 2000No. 2—98—1501, 2—99—0119 consPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galasso
The plaintiff, Robert Carroll, appeals from orders of the circuit court of Winnebago County dismissing his third and fourth amended complaints for personal injuries against the defendants, Jack R. Faust, Ervin Muenster, Valera Muenster, and Menzis Venko, doing business as Travlur Motel & Lounge, also known as Rustic Motel (collectively Faust), American Water Heater Company (American), and Emerson Electric Company (Emerson).
The following facts are taken from the third and fourth amended complaints. On June 23, 1996, the plaintiff was a guest at Faust’s motel. At approximately 1 a.m., the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Ziemba v. MierzwaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Urbaitis v. Commonwealth EdisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- T & S SIGNS, INC. v. Village of WadsworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- R & B Kapital Development, LLC v. North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Compton v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Lyons v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Revolution Portfolio, LLC v. BealeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Harris v. Old Kent BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.