Legal Opinion

City of Easley v. Portman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 1997No. 2698Published

1Opinion of the Court

327 S.C. 593 (1997)

490 S.E.2d 613

CITY OF EASLEY, Respondent,

v.

Steven Dale PORTMAN, Appellant.

No. 2698.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Heard June 4, 1997.

Decided July 21, 1997.

Rehearing Denied September 3, 1997.

O.W. Bannister, Jr., of Hill, Wyatt, Bannister & Brown, Greenville, for Appellant.

G. Edward Welmaker, of Acker, Welmaker, & Smith, Pickens, for respondent.

GOOLSBY, Judge.

In this driving under the influence of intoxicating liquors (DUI) case, which was prosecuted in the municipal court of the City of Easley, the appellant Steven Dale Portman questions whether the State established the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Howell; Dissent · Howell.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. State v. SinovichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Pressley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. State v. EpesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  4. Parrish v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  5. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API