Legal Opinion

Pridemore v. Williams

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1979No. Docket 78-1249, 78-2705PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.

These cases were consolidated to examine the use of interrogatories in paternity actions filed pursuant to MCL 722.711 et seq.; MSA 25.491 et seq.

In Pridemore the plaintiff filed a complaint under The Paternity Act alleging that defendant was the father of her son. Defendant served interrogatories upon the plaintiff and the plaintiff served a set of interrogatories upon the defendant. Neither party filed answers to the interrogatories. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to answer interrogatories and in the same order denied the defendant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Artibee v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In re CannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Semon v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Cross v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Klein v. FranksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Bowerman v. MacDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Cardenas v. ChavezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Elmore v. EllisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Larrabee v. SachsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API