Ciaramella v. State Farm Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Finally, the fact that defendant had potential knowledge of plaintiffs SUM claim because it was plaintiffs no-fault carrier does not alter the fact that plaintiff failed to provide timely written notice (see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Dewyea], 245 AD2d 667, 668). “The resolution of the issue whether plaintiff! ] provided timely notice "turns solely on [his] diligence and therefore on facts within [his] knowledge’ ” (Dixon v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 265 AD2d 914, 915, quoting Matter of Seasonwein [MVAIC], 23 AD2d 732). Defendant’s “actual notice of the accident does not vitiate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dixon v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & DewyeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Insurance & De RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Arbitration between Seasonwein & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & SteberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000