Legal Opinion
Dunahoo v. Huber
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided March 17, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — George Jepson, Judge. A warrant was duly issued and placed in the hands of the defendant as constable, who placed Dunahoo under arrest. Thereupon, he sued out a writ of habeas corpus, and on hearing, was discharged. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, C. J.
The plaintiff, who was arrested for receiving a tip, while engaged as an employee in a barber shop, was discharged on hearing in habeas corpus proceedings. The prosecution' was for violation of Section 5028-u of the Supplemental Supplement, 1915.
“Every employee of any hotel, restaurant, barber shop, or other public place, and every employee of any person, firm, partnership, or corporation, or of any public service corporation engaged in the transportation of passengers in this state, who shall accept or solicit any gratuity, tip, or other thing of value or of valuable consideration, from any…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnston v. BarrillsOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Perkins v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
3Cited by9 opinions
- Racing Ass'n of Central Iowa v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. FachmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- State v. BooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. WrennSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Becker v. Board of Education of Benton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.