Legal Opinion
Scharfenberger v. Holmes
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided November 13, 1974No. 7583-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM; ORDER
BRATCHER, District Judge.
This 1983 action for damages is now before the Court on defendants’ motions for judgmént n. o. v. and, alternatively, on motions for a new trial pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Briefs in support of the respective- positions of the parties have been submitted on the question of whether or not the verdict returned by the jury awarding plaintiff $15,000.00 against each of the defendants Wingo and Wilson should be set aside by the Court. Motions for directed verdicts by each defendant were timely made and denied by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Samuel Simblest v. Joseph MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Douglas Stiltner v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- John Wayne Reeves and Sherry Marie Reeves, Wife v. Power Tools, Inc. And Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Hawkins v. SimsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Elmer Joseph Scharfenberger, Cross-Appellee v. John W. Wingo and Jerry L. Wilson, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Doyle v. Unicare Health Serv., Inc., Aurora CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975