Legal Opinion
Chief Consol. Min. Co. v. Mammoth Min. Co. of Nevada
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 24, 1928No. Nos. 8187, 8210PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
The litigation of which the controversy now before us forms a part has been long continued and has involved several phases. The appellee Mammoth Mining Company of Nevada is the owner of four lode mining elaims in the Tintie mining district of Utah known as the First Northern Extension of the Mammoth, the Jenkins, the Golden King, and the Bradley. Appellant Chief Consolidated Mining Company in the same district owns two elaims, the Silveropolis and Consort. It acquired those claims by purchase from the Grand Central Mining Company, a Colorado corporation. May' 9,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. Milwaukee Refrigerator Transit Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1905
- Sullivan v. Associated Billposters & Distributors of United States & CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Standley v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ives v. G. R. Kinney Corp.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1957
- Kelling Nut Co. v. National Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944