Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chase v. Lujan

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1944No. 4833Published

1DissentMabry, Justice

Mr. Justice THREET and I are unable to join in the majority opinion for the reasons hereinafter to be shown.

All rules of statutory construction, including those our own court has so often emphasized, we believe have been thrust aside in appraising the constitutional language “in which he offers to vote.” The majority opinion concedes that the “great weight” of present authority is against its holding. We go further and say that not one case decided since the time of the Civil War period will support it. We call to our aid the supreme importance of the question and the minority’s very grave…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Twitchell v. BlodgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Sears v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. McGregor v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Chase v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API