Schneider v. New York Telephone Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
This action was brought to recover for injuries suffered by the plaintiff due to the alleged malpractice of the defendant Dr. Rizzo. The claim against the defendant New York Telephone Company is based on the principle of respondeat superior.
Since July 6, 1914, the New York Telephone Company has been a self-insurer under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of New York. During the period covered by the claim in suit, the company has maintained a plan for employees’ pensions, disability benefits and death benefits. As a self-insurer and in connection with its benefit plan, it has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- McDonald v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Chapman v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Matter of Bernstein v. . Beth Israel HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roy v. HartogsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
- Dishman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1950
- Mrachek v. Sunshine Biscuit, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Richard W. Cramer and Stanley W. Cramer v. Ronald C. Hoffman, Robert Sheldon, James W. Littlejohn and St. Lawrence UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Mrachek v. Sunshine Biscuit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.