Legal Opinion

Wild v. Roman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 8, 1966PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

91 N.J. Super. 410 (1966)

220 A.2d 711

CAROL WILD AND STANLEY WILD, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

DR. EMANUEL ROMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 20, 1965.

Decided June 8, 1966.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.

Mr. Albert L. Cohn argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. David & Albert L. Cohn, attorneys; Mr. Daniel Crystal, on the brief).

Mr. Charles C. Stalter argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Stalter, Doan & DeYoe, attorneys; Mr. Aaron Dines, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs'…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. State v. ClawansSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  5. Haid v. LoderstedtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Bender v. AdelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  5. Maul v. KirkmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API