Legal Opinion
Romeo & Sons, Inc. v. P.C. Yezbak & Son, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 20, 1995PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTEMURO, Justice.
This case raises the issue of which statute of .limitations should be applied to a written contract for the construction of a commercial building. The Superior Court, although correctly applying a six-year limitation period, erroneously concluded that 42 Pa.C.S. § 5527 (1982) controls this .scenario. 1 Rather, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5527(2) (1980), before its amendment in 1982, governs the instant claim. 2
On August 13, 1979, appellant, P.C. Yezbak & Son, Inc. (“Yezbak”), entered into a written contract to construct a warehouse/office building for appellee, Romeo & Sons, Inc.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- A. J. Aberman, Inc. v. Funk Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Ragnar Benson, Inc. v. Bethel Mart AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Dixon EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Romeo & Sons, Inc. v. P.C. Yezbak & Son, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Gustine Uniontown Associates, Ltd. v. Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. KhorramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Chi. Title Ins. Co. v. Mazik (In re Mazik)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Tredennick v. BoneDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.