Legal Opinion

Smith v. Marion Fruit Jar

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1911No. 16,978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MASON, J.:

In 1904 Stinson Smith, thirteen years of age, was employed in the factory of the Marion Fruit Jar and Bottle Company. His hand was lacerated by a power fan, and his death resulted. His father recovered a judgment against the company, from which it appeals.

The child labor statute (Laws 1905, ch. 278; amended by Laws 1909, ch. 65, Gen. Stat. 1909, §§ 5094-5098) is not involved, as it was not enacted until 1905. The factory act (Laws 1903, ch. 356, Gen. Stat. 1909, §§ 4676-4683) does not apply, because the deceased was not injured while engaged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. City of Kansas City v. SieseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Pittsburg Vitrified Paving & Building Brick Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. City of Kansas City v. OrrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pennington v. Little Pirate Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Dugdale v. St. Joseph Railway, Light, Heat & Power Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API