Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Catalano

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 19, 1956No. 23974_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

The defendant was convicted on each of three counts which in substance charged him, together with one Kritsky, with the armed robbery of a branch of the Bank of The Manhattan Company, and the taking of over $24,000 in currency.

During the trial defendant’s counsel approached the Bench and told the court in substance that he had received a phone call the night before from a person who refused to give his name, stating that he had knowledge that certain officers had discussed this case in the presence of jurors, and that he had heard something to the effect that Catalano…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. SorceyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  5. United States v. RakesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Bullock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  3. Catalano v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  4. Charles Catalano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Alonzo Bullock, William A. Brakebill, Lawrence J. Brantley, Clyde A. Cook, Mary Nell Currier and Willard H. Till v. United States of America, Frederick John Kasper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API