Legal Opinion
State v. Iverson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1974No. Crim. 475, 476PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Justice.
The defendants were individually charged with the crime of possession of a controlled substance, as defined in Sections 19-03.1-05 and 19-03.1-23 of the North Dakota Century Code. They made motions to suppress evidence seized at a home which they occupied. After a hearing, the trial court granted the motions to suppress. The State filed a notice of appeal, and urges in this court that it has a right to appeal from the order of suppression. The defendants contest this claim, asserting that the State has no right to appeal from an order of suppression, since such orders are not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. FieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HogieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. DilgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. StockertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.