Legal Opinion

Francisco v. Francisco

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 22, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Beatrice Francisco was granted a divorce from her husband, Ralph, on the ground of *280adultery. The judgment directed that the husband pay debts of the wife in the amount of $942.84, by way of a lump sum partial alimony allowance, and reserved for future consideration the question of awarding monthly alimony payments. The husband has appealed, claiming that no alimony should have been awarded.

The appellant presents three arguments in support of his contention that no alimony should have been awarded. The first is that the ground on which the divorce was granted was not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collins v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Whitaker v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Bobbitt v. BobbittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  4. Lester v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  5. Perkins v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martha M. Mclaughlin v. MclaughlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  2. Lindsey v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  3. Tanner v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API