Francisco v. Francisco
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
Beatrice Francisco was granted a divorce from her husband, Ralph, on the ground of *280adultery. The judgment directed that the husband pay debts of the wife in the amount of $942.84, by way of a lump sum partial alimony allowance, and reserved for future consideration the question of awarding monthly alimony payments. The husband has appealed, claiming that no alimony should have been awarded.
The appellant presents three arguments in support of his contention that no alimony should have been awarded. The first is that the ground on which the divorce was granted was not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Collins v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Whitaker v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Bobbitt v. BobbittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Lester v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Perkins v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martha M. Mclaughlin v. MclaughlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
- Lindsey v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
- Tanner v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969