Legal Opinion

Park v. . N.Y. Central H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1898PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by the plaintiff, who was an engineer in the employ of the defendant, to recover for injuries sustained by reason of the collision with a freight train, caused by the negligence of one Brown, a brakeman in the employ of the defendant.

The freight train on the evening of November 21, 1891, had been switched from its regular track to the cast-bound passenger track near Canastota, and had proceeded eastward a little over a mile from that station when it became stalled and the train broke in two, leaving the rear portion of the train stationary at a point about eight…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baulec v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Monahan v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Marrinan v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Guedon v. RooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lix v. GastianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Fleming v. Northern Tissue Paper MillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Rosenstiel v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. O'Donnell v. American Sugar Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API