Legal Opinion

Larke v. City of Fort Lauderdale

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 1990No. 89-1312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Claimant, Robert Larke, appeals from a compensation order dismissing his claim *59for restoration of sick leave and vacation time depleted in connection with his com-pensable heart attack on the basis of lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

Claimant, a fire commander employed by the City of Fort Lauderdale (City), suffered a compensable heart attack. The City, which is self-insured, paid claimant all benefits owing to him under the Workers’ Compensation Law. In addition, claimant received monies from the City equal to one-third of his average weekly wage, with the result…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Piezo Technology & Prof. Adm'rsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Marion Correctional Inst. v. KriegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Bair v. Blue Ribbon, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. Chancey v. Florida Public UtilitiesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Rudolph v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SHATTUCK OWEN v. Snowbird Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Williams v. CITY OF FORT WALTONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. City of West Palm Beach v. BurbaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API