Larke v. City of Fort Lauderdale
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
Claimant, Robert Larke, appeals from a compensation order dismissing his claim *59for restoration of sick leave and vacation time depleted in connection with his com-pensable heart attack on the basis of lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
Claimant, a fire commander employed by the City of Fort Lauderdale (City), suffered a compensable heart attack. The City, which is self-insured, paid claimant all benefits owing to him under the Workers’ Compensation Law. In addition, claimant received monies from the City equal to one-third of his average weekly wage, with the result…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Piezo Technology & Prof. Adm'rsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Marion Correctional Inst. v. KriegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Bair v. Blue Ribbon, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Chancey v. Florida Public UtilitiesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Rudolph v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SHATTUCK OWEN v. Snowbird Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Williams v. CITY OF FORT WALTONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- City of West Palm Beach v. BurbaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994