Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blankenship v. Overholt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 28, 1990No. 89-206Published

1Dissent

Eddie N. Christian, Special Justice,

dissenting. Appellees, Theresa Overholt and Debbie Frye, leased a house in Jacksonville, Arkansas, owned by appellant, Bill Blankenship. Blankenship hired John Finley to make certain repairs, including the laying of tile in the kitchen area of the leased premises. Finley, in the course of removing the old floor surface, utilized gasoline as a glue removal agent. A flash fire ensued and Frye was burned. Overholt’s and Frye’s personal property was also damaged or destroyed.

At trial, Blankenship alleged that there was no substantial evidence that Finley was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evans v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Grendell v. KiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Alpha Zeta Chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity v. SullivanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. First National Bank v. LeonardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API