State v. Rowe

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an indictment for the larceny of a bale of cotton. The appellant and one Waymer were jointly indicted. Both were convicted and the appellant alone appealed. In argument the appellant states three questions:

I. “Was there any reasonable testimony as to the identity of the alleged stolen cotton?”

There was sufficient evidence. It would be unfair to state it, as a new trial must be ordered. This assignment of error' cannot be sustained.

II. “Did the Court err in charging the jury in respect to a presumption of fact arising from the…