State v. Roof
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Associate Justice Fisi-iburne.
The defendant was convicted upon a bill of indictment charging him with the larceny of an automobile, the property of Edward Hartley, on Wednesday, the 30th day of August, 1939. From this judgment the defendant appeals, assigning error.
It is first contended that proof of the corpus delicti had not been established, and that the Court erred in refusing to direct a verdict on this ground.
There was evidence tending to show that Edward Hartley, the owner of the automobile, who lived at Batesburg, accompanied by J. D.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lusk v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- State v. PruittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Haynes v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. Al-AminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- State v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. TealSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- State v. DeWittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.