Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Richard Lamar Green v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2018No. 2017-KA-00770-SCTPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

KING, JUSTICE, CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:

¶ 27. Although I agree with the majority's conclusion that the State produced sufficient evidence to support Green's attempted murder conviction, I respectfully dissent from the majority's finding that the State produced sufficient evidence to support his kidnapping conviction. I would find that Green's act of moving Cathy from the bedroom of her house to the living room of her house merely was incidental to the attempted murder.

¶ 28. Green argues that, because his confinement of Cathy had no significance independent of his assault of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Warren P. Berry. Appeal of Warren Berry. Appeal of Guillermo BrignoniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Cotton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Cuevas v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Dexter Powell v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API